SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 413

VIJAY BISHNOI
MANJEETSINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. M.L. Vishnoi
For the Respondent: Mr. Laxman Solanki, P.P

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No. 174/2018 of Police Station Sadar, Nimbahera for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15 NDPS Act. He has preferred this second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it is clear from the statement of Sanjay Sharma (PW-3), the then SHO of Police Station Sadar Nimbahera that 45 bags containing poppy husk weighing 8 quintal 88 kgs. and 800 gms. were recovered and the Seizure Officer first marked the said bags as 1 to 45 then took 100 gms of poppy husk each from bag Nos. 1 to 43 and mixed the same, thereafter took two samples of 500 gms each from that mixture. Thus, it is clear that the Seizure Officer did not collect separate samples from each bag. It is also submitted that the I.O. has not stated that the test by the U.N. Kit was carried out on each bag before taking small quantity of poppy husk for samples.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance on the decision of this Court rendered in the case of Netram v. State of Rajasth




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top