SANDEEP MEHTA
Netram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Gaunter Edwin Kircher v. State of Goa AIR 1993 SC 1456
None of the cases explicitly indicate that they have been overruled, reversed, or explicitly treated as bad law based solely on the provided descriptions. There are no clear statements such as "overruled," "reversed," or "criticized" in the summaries. Therefore, based on the information available, no case is definitively identified as bad law.
Several cases repeatedly cite the decision in "Netram v." (e.g., MANJEETSINGH VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 413, Suresh VS State of Rajasthan, Through PP - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 462, Rekha Ram VS State of Rajasthan - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 623, Raju VS State - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1520, Suresh Kumar VS State - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1912, Kailash Singh VS State - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1862, Buta Singh VS State - 2020 0 Supreme(Raj) 230, Ratan Lal S/o Dalu Lal Kumawat VS State - 2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 138) and describe reliance on it for legal arguments. This indicates that "Netram v." is considered authoritative or binding in subsequent rulings.
Cases such as Amit Kumar VS State of Rajasthan - 2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 1949, Samrath Kanhaiyalal Meena VS State of Rajasthan - 2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 1250, Champa Lal @ Champa Ram @ Mukesh VS State of Rajasthan, Through PP - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 2591, Ratan Lal VS State of Rajasthan, Through PP - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 2507, MANJEETSINGH VS STATE OF RAJASTHAN - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 413, Suresh VS State of Rajasthan, Through PP - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 462, Rajunath S/o Sh. Ratannath VS State, through P. P. - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 472, Rekha Ram VS State of Rajasthan - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 623, Raju VS State - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1520, Suresh Kumar VS State - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1912, Kailash Singh VS State - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 1862, Buta Singh VS State - 2020 0 Supreme(Raj) 230, Ratan Lal S/o Dalu Lal Kumawat VS State - 2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 138, and Ramdev VS State - 2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 2134 show consistent reliance on the "Netram" decision, suggesting it is treated as good law and a binding precedent.
There are no explicit indications that any case has distinguished or set apart from "Netram" or other cases, based solely on the summaries.
The repeated reliance on "Netram" without noting any deviation suggests that it remains a relevant and uncriticized authority.
Some cases (Amit Kumar VS State of Rajasthan - 2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 1949, Samrath Kanhaiyalal Meena VS State of Rajasthan - 2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 1250, Charlse Howell @ Abel Kom VS N C B - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 1936, Champa Lal @ Champa Ram @ Mukesh VS State of Rajasthan, Through PP - 2019 0 Supreme(Raj) 2591) mention the "decision in Netram" and similar issues but do not specify whether the decision has been overruled or criticized. Without explicit language, the treatment remains uncertain.
The references to "in support of arguments" and reliance on "Netram" imply adherence but do not confirm whether the case has been universally followed or whether there has been any judicial criticism.
Cases like Ramdev VS State - 2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 2134 and Arun Kumar Pandey S/o Jaleshwar Pandey VS Union Of India, Through PP. - 2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 81 cite earlier decisions but do not specify their current standing or treatment status, making their treatment ambiguous.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.