IN THE HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
ALOK SHARMA, J.
Mukesh Kumar Sharma and Others - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan and Others - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 2322 of 2019, Civil Writ Petition Nos. 23343, 24497, 24501, 24621, 26566 of 2018, 254, 795, 2700, 2823, 5872, 6098, 7500, 7605, 7693, 798 of 2019
Decided On : 24-05-2019
PANCHAYATI RAJ - APPOINTMENT OF SECRETARY AND OTHER STAFF - VLW-CUM-PS AND CLERK GRADE-II - DISTINCT POSTS - ADDITIONAL CHARGE OF VLW-CUM-PS TO CLERK GRADE-II - ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER - VALIDITY - RAJASTHAN PANCHAYATI RAJ ACT, 1994, SECTION 78 - RAJASTHAN PANCHAYATI RAJ RULES, 1996, RULES 258, 266, 277B, 331.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, Clerks Grade-II under the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Establishments, challenged the State Government's order directing that the additional charge of the post of VLW-cum-PS in a Panchayat be handed over only to a VLW-cum-PS in another Panchayat in the vicinity and not to the other staff in the concerned Panchayat including the Clerk Grade-II.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the posts of VLW-cum-PS and Clerk Grade-II are wholly unrelated and distinct, with different educational qualifications, pay scales, and functions. The decision of the State Government to give "additional charge" is an administrative order that does not suffer arbitrariness or prejudice the petitioners' legal or fundamental rights. Under Section 78(1)(a) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, it is mandatory to appoint a VLW-cum-PS in every Panchayat, and Rule 331(3) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996, visualizes a VLW-cum-PS of a Panchayat holding additional charge of such a post in another Panchayat in the vicinity.
Issues: 1. Whether the posts of VLW-cum-PS and Clerk Grade-II are distinct and unrelated? 2. Whether the State Government's order directing that the additional charge of the post of VLW-cum-PS be handed over only to a VLW-cum-PS in another Panchayat is valid?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court relied on the provisions of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, and the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996, to hold that the posts of VLW-cum-PS and Clerk Grade-II are wholly unrelated and distinct, with different educational qualifications, pay scales, and functions. 2. The court held that the decision of the State Government to give "additional charge" is an administrative order that does not suffer arbitrariness or prejudice the petitioners' legal or fundamental rights. The court also held that under Section 78(1)(a) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, it is mandatory to appoint a VLW-cum-PS in every Panchayat, and Rule 331(3) of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996, visualizes a VLW-cum-PS of a Panchayat holding additional charge of such a post in another Panchayat in the vicinity.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitions with costs of Rs. 5000/- each to be paid by each of the petitioners in all the writ petitions. 80% of the costs to be paid to the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority Jaipur (RSLSA) and 20% thereof to the Rajasthan High Court Bar Association Jaipur. The costs to be paid within a period of 90 days from the date of the order.
1. These petitions raising a common issue of law do not entail any adjudication of disputed question of facts, and therefore are being addressed and decided by this common judgment. SBCWP No. 2322/2019, Mukesh Kumar Sharma & Others v. State of Rajasthan and others, will be adverted to as the lead case for referring to the underlying facts, where necessary.
2. The petitioners are all clerks Grade-II under the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Establishments under Zila Parishads and holders of ministerial subordinate posts in the Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads under the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 (hereafter `the Rules of 1996).
3. Section 78 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (hereafter the Act of 1994) speaks of appointment of Secretary and other staff. Clause (a) of sub-section 1 thereof provides that there shall be for every Panchayat a Secretary, who shall be appointed in the prescribed manner. Clause (b) thereof provides that every Panchayat may with the previous approval of the Panchayat Samiti appoint such other staff as may be necessary for carrying out the duties imposed on it by or under this Act on such conditions of service as may be prescribed.
4. Rule 258 of the Rules of 1996 speaks of the category of the posts. The posts of Village Level Worker-cum-Panchayat Secretary (VLW-cum-PS) and Clerk Grade-II fall separately as distinct posts under the Ministerial and Subordinate posts in Panchayat Samiti and Zila Parishad service. Rule 277B of the Rules of 1996 inter alia provides the procedure and method for direct recruitment for the post of VLW-cum-PS on the one hand and Clerk Grade-II on the other. These two posts are to be filled up by direct recruitment through a competitive examination conducted by the Rajasthan Subordinate and Ministerial Service Selection Board in accordance with the rules. Rule 266 of the Rules of 1996 deals with distinct and different academic qualifications inter alia for recruitment to the post of Clerk Grade-II (LDC) and VLW-cum-PS. While the academic qualification for the post of Clerk Grade-II is Senior Secondary from a recognized board or its equivalent examination, the academic qualification for the post of VLW-cum-PS is Graduate or qualification declared equivalent thereto by the Government. The requisite professional qualification with regard to computer certificate is however similar for both the posts of VLW-cum-PS and Clerk Grade-II.
5. The VLW-cum-PS has a statutorily defined role description under Section 78 of the Act of 1994 and Rule 331 of the Rules of 1996. The role description of Clerk Grade-II is administratively determined from time to time by the State Government. The roles are wholly distinct. In fact pay scales of the two posts in issue are also distinct and so is the source of payment of salaries.
6. The case of the petitioners is that albeit they are appointed as Clerks Grade-II in various Panchayats, vide orders dated 24- 6-2014, 11-9-2014, 23-3-2015 and 4-8-2017, by the administrative department, it was provided that where the post of VLW-cum-PS was vacant for reason of non posting of an incumbent thereto or the incumbent being on long leave, the charge of the said post be given to Clerk Grade-II of the Gram Panchayat concerned for the purpose of managing its affairs. These administrative orders are stated to be rooted in the autonomy of the Panchayati Raj Institutions mandated by Article 243-G and 243-H of the Constitution of India. It has been submitted that even otherwise for the efficiency in public interest in the administration of Gram Panchayat a Clerk Grade- II posted in Panchayat concerned ought to be given additional charge of the post of VLW-cum-PS, wherever the incumbent VLW-cum-PS has not been posted or when posted is on long leave as he can constantly engage in the requisite work day to day.
7. It has been submitted that vide circular/ order dated 17- 5-2018 the State Government however passed an administrative order providing that in t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.