PANKAJ BHANDARI, J.

1. Petitioner-complainant has preferred this revision petition aggrieved by order dated 16.05.2018 passed by Additional District Judge Woman Atrocities Cases No. 2, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur, whereby the Court below has rejected the prayer of complainant for sending the matter for re-investigation and has refused to take cognizance against respondents No. 3 to 7. Petitioner has also challenged the order vide which charges have been framed under Section 498-A & 306 of I.P.C. and in alternative under Section 304-B of I.P.C. Prayer in this regard is that charges should have been framed under Section 304-B, 498-A, 406, 201 and 120-B of I.P.C. Aggrieved by the same order petitioner Mukesh Budhania has preferred revision petition for quashing and setting-aside the order dated 16.05.2018. As both the revision petitions pertain to common order, both are decided by this common order.

2. In brief the factual matrix of the case are that an FIR No. 193/2017 was registered at Police Station Mahesh Nagar, Jaipur (South) with the allegation that complainant’s daughter has been killed by her in-laws namely; Mukesh Budaniya, Ramnath, Satyanarayan and other family membe