S.RAVINDRA BHAT, PRAKASH GUPTA
Milap Chand Dandia – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.
"A republic, if you can keep it." - Benjamin Franklin, after the Constitutional Convention resolved to adopt a republican form of government in the USA.
1. In this petition filed in public interest, a challenge has been laid to the constitutionality of Section 7BB and Section 11 of the Rajasthan Ministers Salaries Act, 2017, which provide that former Chief Ministers shall get for the remainder of their lives, a government residence, a car for their family members, telephone and a staff of 10 persons including a driver.
2. The public interest litigant submits that Articles 164(5), 195 and Entries 38 and 40 of List II of the Constitution of India provide only for payment of salary and allowances to the members of legislatures or to the ministers. There is no specific provision for residence and conveyance allowance for them in these provisions. Therefore, former Chief Ministers are not entitled to a government residence, or a residence at public expense, or a car for their family members, telephone and staff of ten including a driver.
3. It is submitte
Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress v. State Of Madhya Pradesh and Others (2011) 5 SCC 29
E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu and Another
Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain and Another
Lok Prahari v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
Lok Prahari v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and Another
Raghunathrao Ganpatrao v. Union of India
Sachidanand Pandey and Another v. State of West Bengal and Others
Shiv Sagar Tiwari v. Union of India and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.