ARUN BHANSALI
Indra Vikram Singh Chouhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
ARUN BHANSALI, J.
1. These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners aggrieved against the orders dated 29.05.2019, whereby the Project Director (LP&SHG) Rajivika has, relying on provisions of Rule 144A of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 ('the Rules'), terminated the deputation of the petitioners and they have been repatriated to the parent department i.e. the Secondary Education Department.
2. It is, inter alia, submitted in the writ petitions that by order dated 03.07.2012 and 25.09.2013, the petitioners, who are Teachers Grade-III were appointed on deputation as PFT Manager/Coordinator, the order was passed by the State Mission Director, Rajivika Projects. Subsequent thereto, by order dated 16.04.2015 (Annex.-3), the petitioners were appointed as Accounts Assistant, DPMU again on deputation, which order was also issued by the State Mission Director. The petitioners continued to function in the said position when by order (Annex.-8) dated 29.05.2019, the Project Director noticing that the petitioners were appointed as PFT Manager/Coordinator on deputation on 03.07.2012 and 25.09.2013 respectively and were presently working with the District Project Management Unit,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.