SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 972

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Madangopal – Appellant
Versus
Sagar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.C. Maloo
For the Respondent: Sajjan Singh and K.N. Prajapat

JUDGMENT :

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.

1. This is second round of litigation by the petitioners in revision preferred before this Court against the order dated 20.10.2012, whereby learned Additional District Judge No. 2, Jodhpur Metropolitan in a civil suit preferred for partition by plaintiff-Sagar alias Bharat Kumar has refused to decide issues No. 5, 10, 11, 12, 13 & 15 as preliminary issues and has held that the same involve questions of fact and law and shall be decided after recording evidence.

2. Brief facts, which require to be noted for disposal of the petition, are that the plaintiff has preferred a suit for partition of a coparcenary property, which was later on amended. As per the amended plaint, it is stated that the defendants No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 and the plaintiff are members of a Joint Hindu Family and are coparceners.

3. It is stated that Late Mal Ji was the ancestor of all the parties, who expired leaving behind two brothers, Mohan Lal and Kanhaiya Lal in 1960. The property of Mal Ji being an inherited property jointly owned was divided by oral partition between Mohan Lal and Kanhaiya Lal on 03.11.1964. The property which came in possession of Mohan Lal and his children i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top