Amit Singh vs State of Rajasthan - 2020 Supreme(Raj) 15

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2020 Supreme(Raj) 15

SANDEEP MEHTA
Amit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Nishant Bora
For the Respondents: Aneesh Bhurat, PP

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Mehta, J.

1. The appellants herein have been convicted and sentenced as below vide judgment dated 21.05.2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 2, Bhilwara in Sessions Case No. 01/2004:

Amit Singh, Meenu @ Manjeet Singh, Harendra Singh, Lalit Kumar, Rinku Singh, Dharmendra Singh and Robin Tyagi:

Offences	Sentences	Fine	Fine Default sentences
Under Section 399 IPC	2 years' R.I.	Rs. 500/- each	Two Months' S.I.
Under Section 402 IPC	2 years' R.I.	Rs. 500/- each	Two Months' S.I.

Amit Singh and Lalit Kumar:

Offences	Sentences	Fine	Fine Default sentences
Under Section 3/25 of the Arms Act	1 year's R.I.	Rs. 300/- each	One Month's S.I.

Meenu @ Manjeet Singh, Rinku Singh, Harendra Singh, Dharmendra Singh and Robin Tyagi:

Offences	Sentences	Fine	Fine Default sentences
Under Section 4/25 of the Arms Act	1 year's R.I.	Rs. 300/- each	One Month's S.I.

All the substantive sentences awarded to the ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2020 Supreme(Raj) 15

SANDEEP MEHTAAmit Singh – AppellantVersusState of Rajasthan – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

SANDEEP MEHTA
Amit Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent