SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Raj) 2623

VIJAY BISHNOI
Kamal Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sunil Bishnoi, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, P.P, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No. 15/2019 of Police Station Sadar, District Sri Ganganagar for the offence punishable under Section 8/22 of NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the prosecution story, total 225 Trio-SR tablets containing narcotic substance Tramadol alleged to have been recovered at the instance of petitioner, however, the total weight of the recovered tables is 100 gms., whereas up to 250 gms. of narcotic substance Tramadol is considered as below commercial quantity.

4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

6. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Kamal Kumar S/o Omprakash shall be released on bail in connectio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top