SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Raj) 230

VIJAY BISHNOI
Buta Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rakesh Matoria, Advocate, Mukesh Trivedi, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vijay Bishnoi, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No.36/2018 of P.S. Rajgarh, Distict Churu for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15 and 29 of NDPS Act. He has preferred this third bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that after rejection of second bail application of the petitioner, statements of Bhagwan Sahay, Seizure Officer (PW-4), the then S.H.O. of Police Station, Rajgarh and it is clear from his statements that four bags containing poppy husk weighinng 80 kgs. were seized by the police and the Seizure Officer first mixed the said poppy husk on a tarpaulin and thereafter took two samples of 500 gms each from that mixture. Thus, it is clear that the Seizure Officer did not collect separate samples from each bag. It is also submitted that the Seizure Officer has not stated that the test by the U.N. Kit was carried out on each bag before taking some quantity of poppy husk for samples.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance on the decision of this Court ren

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top