INDRAJIT MAHANTY, VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar – Appellant
Versus
Mukesh Sharma S/o Shri Ram Swaroop Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Mr. Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
1. The defects pointed out by the Registry in some of the appeals are over-ruled.
2. In some of the appeals, applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act have been filed for condonation of delay.
3. For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the same are allowed and the delay caused in filing the appeals is condoned.
4. The present batch of appeals led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1456/2016 Sunil Kumar Ojha vs. Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur arise out of the order dated 16.01.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge and other connected matters came to be decided on different dates by the learned Single Judge i.e. on 30.08.2018, 17.07.2018, 20.07.2018, 14.08.2018, 14.02.2019 & 14.11.2018. Since the common question of law and fact is involved in all these matters, as such, they are being disposed of by this common judgment. Brief facts which are required to be noted for deciding the controversy are that respondents-petitioners were appointed on different posts viz. Chowkidar/Peon, Book Attendant, LDC, Library Assistant, Junior Account
State of Rajasthan vs. Dayalal reported in (2011) 2 SCC 429
ONGC Ltd. vs. Petroleum Coal Labour Union and Ors. AIR 2015 SCW 2866
Sheo Narian Nagar and Ors. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr. AIR 2018 SC 233
State of Karnataka & Ors. vs. Uma Devi & Ors. reported in AIR 2006 SC 1806
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Arvind Kumar Srivastava (2015) 1 SCC 347
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.