DINESH MEHTA
Rajeshwari – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. By way of the present writ petition, petitioners have raised a grievance that the respondents have not reserved any post for divorcée category, whereas, at least 2% seats ought to have been earmarked for divorcée as per the notification dated 21.05.2018.
2. The precise facts needed for the present purposes are, that the respondent No.2- Rajasthan Subordinate and Ministerial Service Selection Board, issued an advertisement dated 21.05.2018 for filling up 485 posts of Librarian Grade III, out of which 2 posts were earmarked for Widows.
3. Point No.4 of special notes of the advertisement aforesaid is as under:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.