JUDGMENT :

SANDEEP MEHTA, J.

1. The appellants herein have been convicted and sentenced as below vide judgment dated 07.11.2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Bhilwara in Sessions Case No. 6/2013:

Accused Sanwra:

Accused Govind Ram:

All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. Being aggrieved of their conviction and sentences, the appellants have preferred these appeals under Section 374(2) Cr.P.C. Since both these appeals arise out of a common Judgment, they have been heard and are being decided together.

3. Briefly stated facts relevant and essential for disposal of the appeals are noted herein-below:

The complainant Prem Lal (PW-1), submitted a complaint (Ex.P/23) at the Police Station Mandal on 09.11.2012 alleging inter alia that two days earlier, at about 8 o'clock, his nephew Shyamlal aged about 12 years, hereinafter referred to as the victim, had gone to the colony of Jats for singing Gudaliya, (a kind of folklore). At 9 o'clock, Shyamlal's companion Devi Lal and a few more boys came and informed the complainant that the boy had been forcibly taken away by the accused Sanwra, resident of Mandal. A search was made for the victim and the suspect but they could not be traced out. In the morning of 9.11.2012, someone provided information that the dead body of a child was lying on the embankment of Mandal Talaab on which, the informant proceeded there and identified the dead body to be that of the victim. It was further mentioned in the report that alongwith Sanwra, his maternal nephew Nandlal had also been seen.

4. On the basis of this report, an FIR No. 264/2012 (Ex.P/25) came to be registered at the Police Station Mandal for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and the investigation was assigned to Shri Rajmal (PW-15), SHO Police Station Mandal. The Panchnama-Lash was prepared. The spot investigation memo etc. were prepared. Blood stained soil and control soil were lifted from the place of incident. The blood stained shirt and trousers of the victim were also seized. The dead body was subjected to postmortem at the Community Health Centre, Mandal and the postmortem report (Ex.P/11) was issued opining that the cause of death of the child victim was shock as a result of excessive bleeding from the neck injury. An incised wound was noticed on front of the neck extending from one side to the other. The neck muscles, carotid vessels and the trachea were severed. A few abrasions were noticeable on the body of the victim. All the injuries were antemortem in nature. The accused appellant Sanwra was apprehended on 10.11.2012 vide memo Ex.P/26 and the accused appellant Govind Ram Meena was arrested on 12.11.2012 vide memo Ex.P/27.

5. Acting upon the voluntary information (Ex.P/32) supplied by the accused Sanwra under Section 27 of the Evidence Act to the Investigating Officer regarding concealment of the weapon of offence, a knife was recovered from his house vide seizure memo Ex.P/9. Acting in furtherance of the information (Ex.P/29) provided by the accused appellant Sanwra under Section 27 of the Evidence Act to the Investigating Officer, his clothes which were concealed in a well, were recovered vide seizure memo (Ex.P/2). Some more confessional information of both the accused appellants were recorded by the Investigating Officer. The blood stained shirt and trouser of the victim seized vide memo Ex.P/6, the blood stained soil and control soil lifted from the