SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1847

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, ROMESH VERMA, JJ.
Ritesh Kumar - Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.78 of 2021
Decided On : 18-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General

Direct eyewitness testimony sufficient for murder conviction under Section 302 IPC despite no motive; absence of motive not fatal if evidence reliable and conclusive.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Section 302 - Murder - Conviction for life imprisonment upheld on basis of direct eyewitness testimony despite absence of motive - Motive not necessary where eyewitness evidence is convincing and conclusive; absence of motive not fatal if direct evidence establishes guilt beyond reasonable doubt - 'Motive loses its importance only when there is direct evidence of the eyewitnesses, which is convincing and conclusive as to the guilt of the accused' (Paras 49-56). Eyewitnesses saw accused push deceased down hillock, attempt to strike with stone, strangle neck; accused fled upon alarm - Supported by recoveries from spot (purse, chappals, bus ticket), sweater with earring, personal items from accused linking to deceased, medical evidence of strangulation marks, spinal dislocation (C2-C3) causing cardiorespiratory arrest - Identification parade conducted properly thrice before magistrate - Link to deceased established as husband via landlord identification, marriage document, tenancy details (Paras 60-82).

(B) Criminal Trial - Eyewitness Testimony - Minor inconsistencies do not discredit reliable witnesses without enmity towards accused - Independent witnesses corroborated by official witnesses and medical opinion sufficient for conviction (Paras 70-74).

(C) Identification Parade - Valid if conducted before magistrate with muffled accused; prior non-exposure confirmed by witness denial (Paras 57-59).

Facts of the case:
Dead body of woman found in forest near temple with strangulation rope around neck; eyewitness shopkeeper cutting grass nearby saw couple visit temple, purchase items, then accused push woman down hillock, throw stone, bend over her strangling; second witness alerted, accused fled; body unidentified initially, later linked to accused's wife via landlord showing photo, marriage document from rented room vacated day before; accused arrested in another state with travel tickets, photos, attendance card; sweater recovered nearby identified as accused's.

Findings of Court:
Prosecution proved guilt beyond doubt through direct eyewitnesses, medical evidence, recoveries, and circumstantial links; defence witness (relative) unreliable.

Issues: Whether absence of motive fatal to prosecution; validity of identification parade; establishment of link between accused and deceased.

Ratio Decidendi: Direct credible eyewitness testimony renders motive irrelevant; reliable evidence from independent witnesses, corroborated by investigation and medical findings, forms unbroken chain proving guilt; appellate court upholds conviction absent perversity.

Result: Appeal dismissed; conviction and life sentence affirmed.

Table of Content
1. eyewitnesses observed accused push and strangle victim. (Para 1 , 2 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63)
2. investigative recoveries corroborate eyewitness murder accounts. (Para 3 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 64 , 65 , 66)
3. marriage documents link accused as victim's husband. (Para 4 , 15 , 16 , 37 , 38 , 67 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 80)
4. arrest items and tip confirm accused identity. (Para 5 , 26 , 27 , 57 , 58 , 59)
5. defence denials rejected as self-serving testimony. (Para 9 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 79)
6. neck trauma causes death consistent with strangulation. (Para 14 , 35 , 36 , 69)
7. chain of custody preserves evidence integrity. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
8. defence contests motive absence and identification. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48)
9. motive unnecessary with credible direct evidence. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56)
10. reliable evidence proves guilt beyond doubt. (Para 68 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 81 , 82)

Judgment :

Romesh Verma, J.

The present appeal arises out of the judgment/order of conviction, as passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan, on 27.11.2019, whereby the present appellant has been convicted to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- for offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) and in default of payment of fine to undergo further imprisonment for a period of six months, in Sessions Trial No.39-ST/7 of 2016, in case FIR No.07/16, dated 20.01.2016, registered at Police Station, Kala Amb, District Sirmaur H.P.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 20.01.2016, Shri Virender Parmar, Pradhan, Gram Panchayat, Trilokpur, telephonically informed at Police Station, Kala Amb that one dead body of a girl is lying in the forest near ‘Lalita Devi Temple, Trilokpur’. On this information, Head Constable Shamim Akhtar No.212 along with Head Constable Ram Lal No. 451, HHC Ravinder Kumar No.97 and Lady Constable Asha No. 646 in a government vehicle bearing No.HP-17A-6891, which was being driven by driver Ashok Kumar, reached at the spot. Head Constable Shamim Akhtar also telephonically informed Incharge, Police Station, ASI Jai Dev, who had gone to attend a meeting in the Office of the Superintendent of Police at Nahan, also reached on the spot. In the jungle, a pedestrian path which led towards ‘Lalita Mata Temple’, dead body of a girl covered with ‘shawl’ was found in the hillock. On inspection of the spot and dead body, one rope was found tied around the neck of the girl and marks of strangulation were found on her neck. In the meantime, an eye witness regarding the incident, Shri Rinku Ram (PW1), son of Shri Sumer Singh, resident of VPO Trilokpur, Tehsil Nahan, District Sirmaur, H.P., got recorded his statement under Section 154 Cr.P.C., stating therein that he is having a shop of ‘Prasad’ at Trilokpur near ‘Lalita Temple’. According to complainant (PW1), on 20.01.2016, when he was present in his shop along with Shri Karam Chand, Chowkidar of the temple, then at about 12.30 p.m., one boy, who was wearing a black ‘jean’ and sweater and a girl, who was wearing a red colour ‘sari’ and sweater purple in colour, came to his shop, purchased ‘Prasad’ and then went to the temple. According to PW1, the boy was of the age of about 26-27 years and the girl was in between the age of 23-24 years. After paying obeisance in the temple, they returned back. After some time, PW1 went to cut grass near ‘Shiv Temple’ and when he reached near the temple, he found the same boy and girl sitting by the side of the path and when he was cutting grass, they were found sitting on the wall. In the meantime, the boy pushed the girl downwards the ‘hillock’ and the body of the girl stopped in the hillock after rolling for some time. The boy descended from the wall and the girl to save herself from the boy went here and there in the hillock. PW1 tried to call the Chowkidar, who could not hear his call due t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top