IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
Rajasthan Housing Board through Dy. Housing Commissioner & Resident Engineer, Rajasthan Housing Board, Jodhpur - Petitioner
Vs.
Legal Representatives of deceased plaintiff Mani Ram - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2494, 2476 of 2015
Decided On : 11-03-2022
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order 6 Rule 17 – Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 – Section 4(1), 6(1), 5A – Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 – Section 24(2) – Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 – Sections 16, 88, 188, 92(A) – Land Acquisition Act, 1894 – Writ petitions arise out of the judgment and decree passed by the learned Assistant Collector and Executive Magistrate (HQ), which were allowed and decreed in favour of plaintiffs-respondents – Held, Concurrent findings of fact recorded by three courts below does not suffer from any infirmity as same has been recorded after correct appreciation of evidence on record – There is no jurisdictional error in findings recorded by courts below which warrant interference by this Court in exercise of its extra ordinary jurisdiction – There is no force in these writ petitions – Disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
1. The present writ petitions are listed in the “Orders Category” but with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, these petitions are heard for final disposal.
2. Both these writ petitions arise out of the judgment and decree dated 02.12.2000 passed by the learned Assistant Collector and Executive Magistrate (HQ), Jodhpur which were allowed and decreed in favour of the plaintiffs-respondents. The validity of this judgment and decree was assailed before the Revenue Appellate Authority, Jodhpur. The Revenue Appellate Authority, Jodhpur vide its judgment dated 23.09.2002 dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner – Rajasthan Housing Board which was further challenged by the petitioner before the Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer but that second appeal too was dismissed by the Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer vide its judgment dated 02.01.2014. Aggrieved of the three orders passed by these courts, the present writ petitions have been preferred.
3. Since the writ petitions arise out of the common judgments passed by three courts below and the subject matter being common, both these writ petitions are disposed of by this common order.
4. For convenience, the facts are being extracted from SB Civil Writ Petition No. 2476/2015 (Rajasthan Housing Board Vs. Hema Ram & anr.)
5. Succinctly stated the facts of the case are that the dispute relates to the land comprising of Khasra Nos. 134 and 135 measuring approximately 804 bighas and 3 biswas situated in village Sunthla, and Khasra Nos.853/1/751, 846/751, 853/751 and 855/751 measuring 547 bighas 2 biswas of land situated in village Jodhpur. On 04.08.1979, the State Government issued a Notification under Section 4(1) of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred as “the Act of 1953) for acquisition of land measuring 804 bighas 3 biswas situated in Village Sunthla comprising of Khasra Nos.134 and 135. Thereafter, on 08.2.1980, after considering the objections received under Section 5A of the Act of 1953, a declaration under Section 6 of the Act of 1953 was made. Thereafter, on 16.07.1980, an award was passed by the Land Acquisition Officer. On 13.11.1980, the paper possession of the land was handed over to the Rajasthan Housing Board by the Land Acquisition Officer but the actual physical possession was not taken. Subsequently, on 11.5.1981 the mutation of the land comprising of khasra Nos. 134 and 135 of village Sunthla was made in favour of the Rajasthan Housing Board.
6. Likewise, on 23.05.1983, the State Government again issued a notification under Section 4(1) of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 for acquisition of land measuring 547 bighas 2 biswas situated in Village Jodhpur including the land comprising of Khasra Nos. 853/1/751, 846/751, 853/751 and 855/751 including the land of the private respondents. Thereafter, on 9.4.1986, while dispensing with the enquiry made under Section 5A of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 a declaration was issued under Section 6(1) of the Act of 1953. On 28.12.1988, again an award was passed by Land Acquisition Officer for the land comprising of Khasra Nos. 853/1/751, 846/751, 853/751 and 855/751 situated at village Jodhpur. The paper possession of the land was handed over to the Rajasthan Housing Board by the Land Acquisition Officer but actual physical possession was not taken by the Board.
7. During the process of land acquisition proceedings, on 26.6.1985, the plaintiff-respondent No.1- Hema Ram filed a suit against the State Government before the Sub Divisional Officer, Jodhpur for declaration of the khatedari rights of the land in dispute situated in village Jodhpur and Sunthla respectively and sought a declaration of permanent injunction to restrain the defendants-petitioners not to interfere in his possession, as he is in the possession of the said land since the Samvat year 2000 and he has been regularly paying the Bigodi in his capacity as Gair Bapidar and with the coming into force
Kondiba Dagadu Kadam Vs. Savitribai Sopan Gujar & ors. reported in (1999) 3 SCC 722
Prabhu Vs. Ramdeo and others reported in AIR 1966 SC 1721
Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal & ors. reported in AIR 2020 SC 1496
Deep Chandra Juneja Vs. Lajwanti Kathuria (Smt.) (dead) Through L.Rs. Reported in (2008) 8 SCC 497
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for strong documentary evidence to prove continuous possession and khatedari rights over the land, and the significance of concurre....
The Board of Revenue exceeded its jurisdiction by reversing the Revenue Appellate Authority's well-reasoned findings based solely on the non-production of evidence, which was not a deliberate act of ....
Protection of prohibited land and removal of illegal encroachments under the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.