ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Panchu Lal Paharia – Appellant
Versus
Rajneesh Gupta – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The issue involved in both the writ petitions is common and as such with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, both the writ petitions are being decided by the present common order.
2. S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4264/2011 has been filed by the petitioner-Pachulal Pahadiya challenging the order/judgment dated 01.03.2011, passed by the JDA Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter shall be referred to as "the Tribunal") in Appeal No.103/2010 and prayer has been made to dismiss the appeal filed by the respondent No.2-Rajneesh Gupta before the Jaipur Development Appellate Authority.
3. The petitioner-JDA has filed S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.8366/2012 to set aside the judgment dated 01.03.2011, passed by the Tribunal and with the further prayer to dismiss the appeal filed by the respondent No.2 - Rajneesh Gupta.
4. The Tribunal has decided two appeals by a common order i.e. Appeal No.103/2010 and Appeal No.87/2010, filed by the private respondent.
5. The private respondent filed appeal No.87/2010 against the notice dated 08.04.2010 issued by the JDA and filed appeal No.103/2010 challenging the report of Second Committee dated 16.02.2010 and order/site plan dated 14.05.2010.
6. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.