Courts are required to give more weight and consideration to the convenience of the female litigants, and transfer legal proceedings from one court to another should ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their convenience and desisting from putting female litigants under undue hardship.

JUDGMENT

Kuldeep Mathur, J. - The present transfer petition has been filed by the petitioner-wife under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking transfer of divorce petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 being Civil Case No. 67/2019 ("Laxman v. Smt. Chetna @ Seema") pending in the Court of learned Judge, Additional Districts and Sessions Judge, Bhinmal, District Jalore to Family Court, Jodhpur.

2. Heard.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the marriage was solemnized between the petitioner and respondent on 03.06.2015 as per Hindu rites. No issue was born out of the wedlock. The petitioner is residing at her father's house in Jodhpur and there is no one to accompany her to attend proceedings at Additional Districts and Sessions Court, Bhinmal, District Jalore. The distance between Bhinmal and Jodhpur is around 250 kms. She will be put under great degree of hardship in defending the case being Civil Case No. 67/2019 (Laxman v. Smt. Chetna @ Seema) pending in the Court of learned Judge, Additional Districts and Sessions Judge, Bhinmal, District Jalore. She has prayed that the case pending before the Additional Districts and Sessions Judge, Bhinmal, District Jalore may be transferred the court of learned Judge, Family Court, Jodhpur.

4. On 22.07.2020, notice of this transfer petition was issued to the respondent and the proceedings of the case No. 67/2019 pending before the court below were stayed.

5. This Court as well as by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sumita Singh v. Kumar Sanjay & Ors., reported in (2001) 10 SCC 41; Sarkar (Shome) v. Pardip Sarkar [Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 622/2007 decided by Supreme Court on 10.11.2008] Manju Varma v. State of U.P. and Ors. [Civil Appeal No. 8290 of 2002 decided by the Supreme Court on 17.11.2004] and Arti Rani @ Pinki Devi v. Dharmendra Kumar Gupta, reported in (2008) 9 SCC 353 has held that Courts are required to give more weight and consideration to the convenience of the female litigants and transfer legal proceedings from one court to another should ordinarily be allowed. Taking into consideration their convenience, the Court should desist from putting female litigants under undue hardship.

6. Section 24 CPC reads as under:

"24. General power of transfer and withdrawal:

(1) On the application of any of the parties and after notice to the parties and after hearing such of them as desired to be heard, or of its own motion without such notice, the High Court or the District Court may at any stage-

(a) transfer any suit, appeal or other proceeding pending before it for trial or disposal to any Court subordinate to it and competent to try or dispose of the same, or

(b) withdraw any suit, appeal or other proceeding pending in any court subordinate to it; and

(i) try or dispose of the same; or

(ii) transfer the same for trial or disposal to any Court subordinate to it and competent to try or dispose of the same; or

(iii) re-transfer the same for trial or disposal to the Court from which it was withdrawn.

(2) Where any suit or proceeding has been transferred or withdrawn under sub-section (1), the Court which is thereafter to try or dispose of such suit or proceeding may, subject to any special directions in the case of any order of transfer, either retry it or proceed from the point at which it was transferred or withdrawn.

(3) For the purposes of this section,-

(a) Courts of Additional and Assistant Judges shall be deemed to be subordinate to the District Court;

(b) "proceeding" includes a proceeding for the execution of a decree or order.

(4) the Court trying any suit transferred or withdrawn under this section from a Court of Small Causes shall, for the purposes of such suit, be deemed to be a Court of Small Causes

(5) A suit or proceeding may be transferred under this section from a Court which has no jurisdiction to try it."

7. It is noticed that Section 24 of C.P.C. does not even require issuance of notice to the other side and this