Back
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Hava Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J. - Instant Criminal Appeal has been preferred under Section 374(2) of IPC against the impugned judgment dated 30.09.1991 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nohar in Sessions Case No. 25/90. Vide judgment dated 30.09.1991, the appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:-
S. No. | Section | Sentence |
|
1. | Hava Singh | Section 304 Pt. II r/w. Section 34 & Section 323 IPC | 3 years R.I. and Fine of Rs. 100/- and in default further 15 days R.I. |
2. | Mohar Singh | Section 304 Pt. II | 3 years R.I. and Fine of Rs. 100/- and in default further 15 days R.I. |
2. The present appeal arises out of the incident which happened on 02.06.1990 at Suratpura, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh. An FIR No. 93/89 was registered under Section 341 and 323 read with Section 34 of IPC against the appellants. In the incident, Kewal Ram sustained injuries and during treatment, he succumbed to the injuries sustained in the incident and therefore, Section 302 of IPC was also added. The charge sheet in the case was filed and the trial court after undertaking the trial proceedings, convicted the appellants for the aforesaid offences. Against the order dated 30.09.1991 passed by the tr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
