SUDESH BANSAL
Punjab National Bank – Appellant
Versus
Kana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This first appeal under Section 96 CPC has been filed by plaintiff- appellant against the judgment and decree dated 12-8-1991 passed by the District Judge Jaipur District, in Suit No.82/1981, whereby and whereunder dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs.13,570.07 and future interest.
2. The facts of the case are that respondents defendants No.1&2 (hereafter 'the defendants') obtained agricultural loan of Rs.4000/- from plaintiff Bank on 31-1-1970 and mortgaged certain agricultural land, and defendants Nos.3 to 6 are legal representatives of the guarantor. Plaintiff claimed that loan was to be repaid in six monthly instalments along with interest at the rate of 5% above the rate of Reserve Bank of India, but minimum 9% per annum. Since defendants No.1&2 failed to repay the agricultural loan, the plaintiff filed the suit for recovery of agricultural loan on 9-11-1981.
3. On issuing notices respondents-defendants No.1&2 (hereafter 'the defendants') filed written statement on 26-9-1986 and denied to have taken any loan and stated that the agent appointed by plaintiff bank obtained signatures of many agriculturists but no amount was paid to agriculturists. The said agent obtai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.