VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Aspak Khan – Appellant
Versus
Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The case is listed in the 'Orders' category on the application for preponement of the date, however, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is being heard and decided finally today itself.
2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner who is the resident of Pali and who is in the occupation of the house where the electricity connection is being asked for. The petitioner had applied for an electricity connection for his dwelling house by filing an application to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 but the official respondents denied the electricity connection on the ground that no legal document of his occupying the premises was filed for grant of electricity connection.
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is presently in occupation of the dwelling house and has applied for electricity connection by way of filing an application to the respondent Nos. 1 & 2. He submits that since the application was complete in all respect, therefore, the respondent Nos.1, & 2 were under an obligation to provide electricity connection to the petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.