PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Anopa Ram – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant and his wife were living separately from the family and their marriage had occurred about three years ago. The allegation is that there were frequent altercation between the deceased-wife and the family members of the appellant, which resulted she committed suicide on 30.06.1992 by jumping in a well.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant has drawn attention of this Court to the evidence of PW-1, PW-2, PW-3, PW-4, in which, regular allegations have been made but the instigation to commit suicide is missing.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that on perusal of the site map also, it becomes clear that there was no evidence of any kind of force having been used in the act of committing suicide by any third person.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant also submits that the father Budha Ram has vehemently submitted of mutual grievance but unless there was a specific finding regarding the instigation for suicide, such evidence could not have culminated into a criminal conviction.
5. Learned counsel for the appellant relied upon the judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.