SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1061

MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Satya Narayan Rathore – Appellant
Versus
Ramakant – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Tarun Jain, Advocate, for the Petitioner

JUDGMENT

1. This writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners/defendants assailing the legality and validity of the order dated 03.02.2021 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Sawai Madhopur allowing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.06/2018 preferred by the respondents/plaintiffs against rejection of their temporary injunction application by the learned Civil Judge, Sawai Madhopur vide its order dated 10.01.2018 in Civil Miscellaneous Case No.150/2016.

2. The facts in brief are that the respondents/plaintiffs filed a suit for mandatory and permanent injunction against the petitioners/defendants stating therein that they are family members and their ancestral house was partitioned way back on 11.07.1969. It is averred that the plaintiffs are enjoying easementary right of air and light over an open 'Gali' of four and a half feet width towards eastern side of their portion in which the defendants were trying to raise construction to deprive them of their easementary right. Their temporary injunction application filed alongwith the suit was dismissed by the learned trial Court vide its order dated 10.01.2018 which was successfull

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top