SANDEEP MEHTA, VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Child Deve – Appellant
Versus
Mamta Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The instant misc. application has been filed by the State of Rajasthan seeking restoration of D.B. Civil Special appeal (Writ) No.478/2013 which was dismissed by Division Bench of this Court on account of the fact that no one appeared to argue the case on behalf of the State on 12.05.2016 and also on 16.05.2016 on which date, the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.
2. The restoration application is delayed by 761 days. The explanation, which has been offered in the application under Section 5 of the Limitation act for the gross delay in filing of the restoration application, is that the additional advocate General concerned was not aware regarding the passing of the order dated 16.05.2016 and thus, the restoration application could not be filed in time. We are of the firm view that this plea is totally frivolous and unacceptable. Ignorance of a proceeding taken in the Court can never be considered to be a ground for condoning the delay.
3. Otherwise also, we have examined the matter on merits.
4. The Industrial Disputes Tribunal-cum- Labour Court, Jodhpur allowed the application of the respondent Smt. Mamta Sharma by award dated 15.12.2011 and set aside her retrenchm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.