SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1572

DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Mukesh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.K. Verma, Advocate, Anil Gupta, Advocate, Laxman Solanki, Advocate, Rakesh Matoria, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - In Bail application No. 2199/2022 :-

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.404/2021, Police Station Hanumangarh Junction, District Hanumangarh, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 143, 307 or 307/149, 195(a) or 195(a)/149 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/25 and 27 of the arms act.

2. In Bail application No. 2501/2022:-

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.404/2021, Police Station Hanumangarh Junction, District Hanumangarh, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 143, 195(a) of Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/25 and 27 of the arms act.

3. In Bail application Nos. 2199/2022 and 2501/2022:-

Heard and considered arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners stated that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case; no injury has been caused to anyone; t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top