SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2230

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Sandeep Mehta, Vinod Kumar Bharwani, JJ.
Girdhari Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondents
D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 131 of 2022
Decided On : 18-04-2022

Advocates appeared:
Ms. Ranjana Singh Mertia, for the Appellant
Mr. Anil Joshi, AAG, Mr. Bhagwati Prasad, District Magistrate, Bikaner, Mr. R. Ananteswaran, Superintendent, Central Jail, Bikaner, for the Respondent.

Officials must comply with the Parole Rules, 2021 and ensure timely decision on emergent parole applications, especially in cases of humanitarian grounds.

Headnote:

Inaction - Emergent Parole - The court found that the officials acted with lackadaisical approach and gross indifference to the Parole Rules, 2021 while dealing with the emergent parole application filed on humanitarian ground i.e., the death of the convict's mother. The court directed the Chief Secretary and Home Secretary of the Government of Rajasthan to take necessary action and issue instructions to ensure timely decision on emergent parole applications.

Fact of the Case:

The convict petitioner filed a writ petition to challenge the inaction of the respondents in deciding the emergent parole application submitted on the ground of death of his mother.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the officials acted with lackadaisical approach and gross indifference to the Parole Rules, 2021 while dealing with the emergent parole application. The court directed the Chief Secretary and Home Secretary of the Government of Rajasthan to take necessary action and issue instructions to ensure timely decision on emergent parole applications.

Issues: Inaction on emergent parole application, non-compliance with Rule 23 of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 2021.

Ratio Decidendi: The officials' lackadaisical approach and gross indifference to the Parole Rules, 2021 while dealing with the emergent parole application led to the court's decision to direct the Chief Secretary and Home Secretary of the Government of Rajasthan to take necessary action and issue instructions to ensure timely decision on emergent parole applications.

Final Decision: The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations and directions.

ORDER

1. The instant writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the convict petitioner Girdhari Singh seeking to assail the inaction of the respondents in deciding the emergent parole application submitted on behalf of the convict petitioner on the ground of death of his mother.

2. This Court was apprised that the convict's mother expired on 09.03.2022. The application for interim parole was filed to the Superintendent, Central Jail, Bikaner on 10.03.2022 but the same was not decided for almost a month whereupon, the instant writ petition came to be submitted. On 08.04.2022, this Court gave an oral direction to learned AAG to ensure that the parole application of the convict is decided whereafter the convict-petitioner has been enlarged on emergent parole vide order dated 09.04.2022.

3. By order dated dated 12.04.2022, we had directed that the District Magistrate, Bikaner and the Superintendent, Central Jail, Bikaner to remain present in the Court to show cause and to explain as to why disciplinary proceedings may not be directed against them for blatant non-compliance of Rule 23 of the Rajasthan Prisoners Release on Parole Rules, 2021 as per which, the application for emergent parole is required to be decided within four days of presentation.

4. The explanations of both the officers have been filed on record. Lame excuses have been given for not deciding the parole application of the convict-petitioner within four days in terms of the mandatory requirement of the Rules of 2021. The explanations so submitted are absolutely lackadaisical and unacceptable.

5. Along with the explanation of the District Magistrate, Bikaner, Shri Joshi has filed copy of instruction letter dated 12.04.2022 as per which, the District Collector has issued guidelines so that the emergent parole application filed by the convicts can be dealt with strictly in accordance with the Rules of 2021.

6. We are of the firm view that both the Officers acted with lackadaisical approach and gross indifference to the Parole Rules, 2021 while dealing with the emergent parole application which had been filed on humanitarian ground i.e, the death of the convict's mother. Lame unconditional apologies have been offered in the explanations filed by the Officials which are not considered satisfactory because at few parts of the affidavit, a conscious effort has been made to justify the action.

7. Keeping in view the material available on record, we hereby direct that copy of this order along with copy of the order dated 12.04.2022 and copies of explanations furnished by District Magistrate, Bikaner and Superintendent, Central Jail, Bikaner shall be forwarded to the Chief Secretary, Government of Rajasthan and the Home Secretary, Government of Rajasthan for information and necessary action.

8. The Home Secretary, Government of Rajasthan shall issue pertinent instructions to the District Magistrates and the Superintendents of jails across the State of Rajasthan to ensure that the emergent parole applications submitted by the convicts are not kept pending and are decided immediately on receipt thereof in terms of the Rule 23 of the Rules of 2021.

9. The writ petition is disposed of with the above observations and directions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top