HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Sudesh Bansal, J.
Trehan Apna Ghar Buildwell Private Limited & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Munish Ranjan Sahay & Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 72/2022 and S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 68/2022
Decided On : 06-04-2022
RERA Act - Appeal Registration - Section 58 of RERA Act
Fact of the Case:
The court considered the registration category and court fees payable for appeals filed under Section 58 of the RERA Act, 2016. It examined the provisions of Section 58, the nature of appeals, and relevant precedents.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that appeals under Section 58 of the RERA Act can be maintained/entertained only on the grounds specified under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, involving substantial questions of law. It also determined the applicable court fees for such appeals.
Issues: The issues involved were the registration category for appeals under Section 58 of the RERA Act and the quantum of court fees payable on such appeals.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that appeals under Section 58 of the RERA Act should be registered as 'Civil Misc. Appeal' and can only be entertained on the grounds specified under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It also determined the applicable court fees for such appeals based on the absence of specific statutory provisions.
Final Decision: The court directed the registry to register the appeals as 'Civil Misc. Appeal' and report on the payment of court fees. It also instructed the stamp reporters to follow the same for future appeals filed under Section 58 of the RERA Act.
ORDER
1. Both these appeals have been filed under the provision of Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (hereinafter referred as "RERA Act"). The registry has registered both appeals as second appeals and Court fees of Rs.1000/- in both appeals paid by appellants has been reported as sufficient.
2. Since Section 58 of the RERA Act, 2016 do not specifically provide the nature of appeal as to second appeal and further under the provision of RERA Act and Rajasthan Real Estate (Reulation and Development) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred as "the RERA Rules, 2017"), there is no provision for making valuation of dispute and for quantum of Court fees payable on appeal filed under Section 58 of the RERA Act, hence, two issues fall for consideration by this Court :-
"(1) The appeal filed under Section 58 of the RERA Act, 2016 be registered under which category of appeals before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan.
(2) How much Court fees is payable on appeal filed under Section 58 of the RERA Act, 2016 before the High Court?"
3. In order to adjudicate the issue No.l regarding registration of category/ nature of appeal, it is necessary to look into the provision of Section 58 of the RERA Act.
4. Section 58 of the RERA Act, 2016 reads as under:-
"58. Appeal to High Court.-(1) Any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Appellate Tribunal, may, file an appeal to the High Court, within a period of sixty days from the date of communication of the decision or order of the Appellate Tribunal, to him, on any one or more of the grounds specified in section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908):
Provided that the High Court may entertain the appeal after the expiry of the said period of sixty days, if it is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from preferring the appeal in time.
Explanation.-The expression "High Court" means the High Court of a State or Union territory where the real estate project is situated.(2) No appeal shall lie against any decision or order made by the Appellate Tribunal with the consent of the parties."
5. From perusal of provision of Section 58 of the RERA Act, it stands clear that the appeal can be entertained by the High Court only on the ground as specified under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred as "the Act of 1908").
6. It has been canvassed before this Court that the High Court of Allahabad, High Court of Punjab and Haryana, High Court of Chhattisgarh, High Court of Karnataka, High Court of Bombay and High Court of Madhya Pradesh, in their states have directed to register appeals filed under Section 58 of the RERA Act in different categories like "RERA Appeal", "Civil Misc. Second Appeal", Civil Second Appeal" or "Civil Misc. Appeal". However proposition of law is clear that although appeals may have been allowed to be registered in different categories, nevertheless, the High Courts are ad idem that according to provision of Section 58 of the RERA Act, the appeal can be maintained/entertained only on the grounds as specified under Section 100 of the Act of 1908, it means on involvement of any substantial question of law in the appeal.
7. Section 100 of the Act of 1908 prescribes second appeal from appellate decrees. Section 100 of the Act of 1908 envisages that an appeal shall lie to the High Court, from every decree passed in appeal by any Court, subordinate to the High Court, if High Court is satisfied that case involves a substantial question of law. From perusal of provision of Section 100 of the Act of 1908, the proposition of law clearly emerges that in order to file a second appeal before the High Court, the order/decision passed by the Appellate Court/Authority should follow two ingredients:-"(i) The Appellate Court/Authority/Tribunal should be subordinate to the High Court, (ii) The decision or order passed by the Appellate Court/Authority/Tribunal should be a decree."
8. The RERA Act, 2016 has
AI
Appeals under Section 58 of the RERA Act can only be entertained on the grounds specified under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, involving substantial questions of law. The applicable cour....
An appeal under Section 58 of the R.E.R.A. is not a second appeal as contemplated by Section 100 C.P.C., and the order of the Appellate Tribunal is not a decree. Therefore, it does not require ad-val....
The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 protects home buyers from delays in possession, allowing for compensation through interest, as determined by the Adjudicating Officer under the ....
The jurisdiction for appeals under the RERA Act is determined by the location of the real estate project, necessitating that such appeals be filed in the High Court of the State where the project is ....
The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act mandates granting interest for delays in possession, encompassing circumstances including force majeure, without necessitating rigorous inquiry from t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.