SUDESH BANSAL
Rajkumar Kothari – Appellant
Versus
Dhan Kumar – Respondent
ORDER
1. Petitioner-defendant No.6 has filed this instant revision petition, feeling aggrieved by dismissal of his application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC vide impugned order dated 02.03.2022 passed by Additional District Judge No.4, Jaipur Metropolitan II in suit No.226/2014.
2. It appears from record that respondent-plaintiff No.1 has filed civil suit for partition against the petitioner and other respondents which is pending before the trial Court.
3. Counsel for petitioner submits that respondent-plaintiff has filed the present civil suit mainly claiming his right of partition on the basis of will dated 04.05.1989. Respondent-plaintiff has not produced any will along with plaint and now his statements have been recorded but plaintiff has not produced the will on record.
4. As per plaint, will dated 04.05.1989 is the basic and foundational document to continue proceedings of partition as the plaintiff has claimed right of partition solely on the basis of will.
5. Counsel for petitioner submits that since respondent-plaintiff has not produced the basic document of will on record before the trial Court, the suit is liable to be dismissed on this account alone.
6. Petitioner-defendant No.6
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.