SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1330

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Chenaram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mangilal Vishnoi, Advocate, Laxman Solanki, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.42/2022, Police Station Khinvsar, District Nagaur, for the offences punishable under Sections 8/16, 8/18 of N.D.P.S. act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that about 1120 opium plants have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Counsel further submits that the case of present petitioner falls under Section 18 (C) of N.D.P.S. act, where the punishment can be awarded to the accused up to 10 years and therefore, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. act is not applicable. No other criminal case has been registered against the petitioner. The petitioner in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4. I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top