SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1332

SUDESH BANSAL
Hanuman – Appellant
Versus
Nandlal – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ashok Mishra, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sudesh Bansal, J. - This revision petition under Section 115 CPC has been filed by the petitioner-defendant (hereinafter `the defendant') against the judgment and decree dated 13-11-2018 in appeal No.124/2018 (03/2004) passed by additional District Judge Dudu, District Jaipur, whereby and whereunder dismissing his appeal and affirmed the judgment and decree dated 5-1-2004 in Suit No.34/1997 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) Dudu, District Jaipur whereby and whereunder the respondent-plaintiff (hereinafter `the plaintiff') has been held entitled to receive Rs.13,000/- with 6% p.a. interest from the date of filing suit.

2. Heard learned counsel for defendant and perused impugned judgments and decrees.

3. Facts of the case are that plaintiff Nandlal (since deceased) purchased agricultural land measuring 11 bigha 1 biswa of Khasra No.6707 for a consideration of Rs.1,53,000/- from one Narayan on 7-7-1993 and Rs.1 lac was paid on 8-7-1993, of which transaction mediators were Ram Lal from the side of Narayan and Hanuman (defendant) from the side of plaintiff. Remaining amount Rs.53,000/- was paid to defendant for payment of the same to seller Narayan and on 10-6-1996 mutation

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top