SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1837

DINESH MEHTA
Tej Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ravinder Singh Champawat, for the Appellant.

ORDER

1. By way of present writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 29.12.2021 passed by SDO, Jaisalmer (hereinafter referred to as the 'trial Court') in petitioners' injunction application filed under Section 212 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 1955').

2. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioners have instituted a suit for declaration of rights under Section 88 along with an injunction application under Section 212 of the Act of 1955. Petitioners' injunction application has been rejected by the trial Court vide order dated 29.12.2021.

3. Instead of availing the remedies before the Appellate Authority, the petitioners have directly rushed to this Court inter-alia with the assertion that the respondent - Tehsildar is going to dispossess them.

4. A writ petition against rejection of TI application by the trial Court is not maintainable under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, as a hierarchy of appellate authorities have been provided in the Act of 1955. The petitioners are required to avail remedy of appeal available to them in accordance with law.

5. Writ petition, therefore, fails.

6. Needless to observe that,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top