SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1418

FARJAND ALI
Sidharth Jain – Appellant
Versus
Nidhi Financial Services – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Atul Kumar Jain, Advocate, Through V.C., for the Appellant
Mr. Arvind Kumar, PP, for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. By way of the instant miscellaneous petition, a challenge has been made to the order dated 04.04.2019 passed by the Special Magistrate No.7, Negotiable of Instruments Act Cases, Jaipur Metro Jaipur. Subsequently, the order dated 27.02.2020 was passed by the same Court on the ground that the order passed by the learned Court, vide order dated 04.04.2019 regarding payment of interim compensation is not in accordance with law. Counsel submits that in this matter, the complaint was lodged in the year 2017, the act constituting an offence had occurred by 2017, whereas, the concerned provision of under Section 143-A of the Act was came into effect from 01.09.2018. Therefore, the same shall not be applied retrospectively. Counsel place reliance on the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in G.J. Rana Vs. Tejraz Surana, in Criminal Appeal No.1160/2019 decided on 30.07.2019.

2. The matter requires consideration.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the order directing to deposit interim compensation is made by the Court to the accused and the same does not affect the right of the complainant in any manner. There would be no need to hear the complainant in t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top