SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2070

DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Amarkala – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Suresh Nehra, Advocate, Arun Kumar, Advocate, Vikas Bijarnia, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.512/2021, Police Station Nohar, District Hanumangarh, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498 a, 304 B, 34 and 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Heard and considered arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that statements of PW.1-Mahendra (father of the deceased), PW.2-Santosh (mother of the deceased), PW.3-Mukesh (sister-in-law of the deceased), PW.4-Mukesh Kumar (brother of the deceased), PW.5-Mahendra [uncle of the deceased (Mama)], PW.6-Rajendra, [uncle of the deceased (Chacha)], PW.7-Pannalal and PW.8-Rajeram (grand father of the deceased) have been recorded before learned trial Court; none of the above mentioned witness has supported the story of prosecution and turned hostile; as per para 5 of the rejection, no other case is registered against the petitioner; petitioner is behind the bars since 18.11.2021; and trial will take time. W

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top