HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Vinit Kumar Mathur, J.
Gordhan Lal Son Of Late Shri Jagannath – Appellant
Versus
Board Of Revenue For Rajasthan, Ajmer & Ors. – Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4051 of 2017
Decided On : 09-03-2022
Delay Condonation - Mutation Entry - The court upheld the rejection of objections against the condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a mutation entry, finding the reasons for delay to be bonafide and sufficient.
Fact of the Case:
The respondent filed an appeal against a mutation entry after a delay of 40 years, claiming lack of knowledge about the entry and his name not being reflected in the revenue record. The petitioner's objections were rejected, and the revision petition was also dismissed.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the reasons for delay in filing the appeal to be bonafide and sufficient, upholding the rejection of objections and the dismissal of the revision petition.
Issues: The main issue was the condonation of delay in filing the appeal against the mutation entry, with the petitioner contending that the reasons for delay were frivolous.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the reasons given for the delay in filing the appeal were bonafide and sufficient, leading to the rejection of objections and dismissal of the revision petition.
Final Decision: The writ petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed, and all pending applications were also dismissed accordingly.
ORDER
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 11.03.2016 (Annex.3) passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Nokha District Bikaner whereby the objections preferred by the petitioner against the application for condonation of delay were rejected and order dated 20.09.2016 (Annex.4) passed by learned Board of Revenue, Rajasthan, Ajmer whereby the Revision Petition filed by the petitioner under section 84 of the Rajasthan land Revenue Act, 1956 was rejected.
3. Briefly the facts necessary to be narrated in short are that the respondent No.3 preferred an appeal against the mutation entry No.187 dated 15.06.1973 before the Sub Divisional Officer, Nokha District Bikaner along with an application under section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. In the application preferred under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the respondent No.3 submitted that the fact regarding mutation entry dated 15.06.1973 came to his knowledge only on 07.01.2015 and thereafter, the matter was inquired and requisite documents were taken from the competent authorities. On coming to know about the names of the persons entered in the revenue record and finding that the name of the respondent No.3 was not reflected, the same was challenged by way of filing an appeal before the Sub Divisional Officer, Nokha District Bikaner. The respondent No.3 submitted that the delay caused in filing the appeal before the S.D.O., Nokha was bonafide and since the mutation entry made on 15.06.1973 was not within his knowledge, he was prevented by sufficient cause from filing an appeal.
4. The petitioner filed objections in the appeal preferred by the respondent No.3 before the Sub Divisional Officer, Nokha District Bikaner on 05.08.2015 contending that the appeal preferred by the respondent No.3 against the mutation entry No.187 dated 15.06.1973 is barred by limitation and no sufficient and good reasons have been given for condoning the delay. The Sub Divisional Officer, Nokha vide its order dated 11.03.2016 rejected the objections filed by the petitioner. Aggrieved against the same, the petitioner preferred a revision petition under section 84 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 before the learned Board of Revenue, Ajmer but the same was also dismissed by the Board of Revenue vide its order dated 20.09.2016. Aggrieved against the orders dated 11.03.2016 (Annex.3) and 20.09.2016 (Annex.4), the petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition before this court.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently submitted that the mutation entry made on 15.06.1973 was sought to be challenged after a delay of 40 years and therefore, the reasons mentioned in the application seeking condonation of delay are frivolous and not sufficient for condoning the delay caused in filing the appeal before the Sub Divisional Officer, Nokha District Bikaner.
6. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents has supported the order dated 11.03.2016 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Nokha District Bikaner and order dated 20.09.2016 passed by learned Board of Revenue, Ajmer.
7. I have considered the submissions made at the bar, gone through the order dated 11.03.2016 passed by Sub Divisional Officer, Nokha District Bikaner, order dated 20.09.2016 passed by learned Board of Revenue and also perused the relevant record.
8. The fact is that the respondent No.3 is heir of Heer Ji and has share in the property but in the revenue record, his name was not reflected. In these circumstances, he preferred an appeal before the Sub Divisional Officer, Nokha District Bikaner after a delay of 40 years on the ground that he was not aware about the mutation entry made on 15.06.1973 and the fact that his name is not reflected in the revenue record.
9. The fact that respondent No.3 filed an application under the Right to Information Act on 20.10.2014 before the Gram Panchayat, Gajrupdesar wa
The court emphasized the importance of bonafide and sufficient reasons for condoning delay in filing an appeal, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an appeal filed beyond the statutory period of limitation must be accompanied by a formal application for seeking condonation of delay, and th....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need for a liberal approach in matters relating to condonation of delay, emphasizing the importance of substantial justice and not denying p....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.