SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1990

DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Umesh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
B.R. Bishnoi, Advocate, Arun Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.35/2021, Police Station Ramgarh, District Jaisalmer, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 457, 380 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Heard and considered arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that offences are triable by Magistrate; petitioner is behind the bars since 26.01.2022; benefit of bail has been granted to co-accused persons, Vikram and Zuber Khan; no investigation or recovery is pending against the petitioner; further investigation and trial will take time. With these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the petitioner.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application of the accused-petitioner and stated that four other cases have been registered against the accused-petitioner and investigation of the case is still pending.

5. Having regard to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top