SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Raj) 1389

DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA
Sachin – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Dinesh Kumar, Advocate, Gaurav Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Devendra Kachhawaha, J. - The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner, who is in judicial custody in connection with F.I.R. No.399/2021, Police Station Mahamandir, District Jodhpur, registered for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that offence is triable by Magistrate; no recovery or investigation is pending against the petitioner; further investigation and trial will take time. With these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the benefit of bail may be granted to the petitioner.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application of the accused-petitioner and stated that earlier two cases of similar nature had been registered against the accused-petitioner.

5. In reply, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that out of two cases, in one case benefit of bail has been granted to the petitioner by learned trial Court.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, particularl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top