SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 72

DINESH MEHTA
Malee Ram Gurjar S/o Shri Gulla Ram Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
Jodhpur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Limited – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Vikas Bijarnia.
For the Respondents: Dhanesh Saraswat, Udit Mathur.

ORDER :

1. Mr. Saraswat, learned counsel for the respondents, at the outset, submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition has been set at rest by Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 304/2021 decided on 16.04.2021 rendered in the case of Manisha Devi Meena vs. Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited and Others which has been followed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in its order dated 03.01.2023 rendered in the case of Manendra Singh vs. Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited and Others, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12880/2020.

2. In the case of Manisha Devi Meena (supra), this Court has observed thus:

    “Before Division Bench of this court in Dr. Priya Verma (supra), question arose that condition to the effect that successful candidate after first counseling will have to submit bank guarantee to the amount of Rs. 5,00,000 at the time of joining at the allotted college so that he/she cannot forego or leave the course. It was also stipulated that if he/she does, the bank guarantee shall be forfeited. The said condition in the prospectus was in pursuance to the decision taken in the meeting at government level. The Division Bench after considering vario

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top