ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Shashi Bala Meena, W/o. Shri Narsi Lal Meena – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank through its Managing Director-Cum-Chief Executive Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
(i) By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature whereof the impugned orders dated 15.1.2015 communicated to the petitioner on 17.01.2015 (Annexure-38) and the order dated 12.03.2015 (Annexure-40) of the Appellate Authority may kindly be quashed and set aside. Further the petitioner may kindly be reinstated in service with all consequential benefits with 24% interest.
(ii) Any other order which this Hon’ble Court may deems fit and proper in facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of petitioner.
(iii) Cost of the writ petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner.”
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that during the entire service, the petitioner was transferred for 24 times and she joined the transferred places obeying the order/command issued by higher authorities. Counsel submits that during the service tenure of petitioner, she was granted three prom
B.C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India
Surya Prakash Gothwal v. State of Rajasthan
Anil Kumar Upadhyay v. The Director General, SSB & Ors.
Central Industrial Security Force v. HC (GD) Om Prakash
Inspecting Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Somendra Kumar Gupta
State Bank of Patiala v. S.K. Sharma
Bank of India v. Jagjit Singh Mehta
Suresh Pathrella v. Oriental Bank of Commerce
The General Manager (P) Punjab & Sind Bank v. Daya Singh
Chairman & Managing Director, United Commercial Bank v. P.C. Kakkar
Chairman cum Managing Director, Coal India Limited v. Mukul Kumar Choudhuri
The court established that procedural flaws in disciplinary inquiries do not automatically invalidate the proceedings unless the employee can demonstrate actual prejudice resulting from those flaws.
The principle of proportionality mandates that disciplinary punishment must be commensurate with the gravity of the misconduct, and dismissal for minor infractions may be deemed excessive.
Judicial review of disciplinary actions is limited; courts cannot reappraise evidence or substitute their judgment unless findings are arbitrary or unsupported by evidence.
Judicial review in disciplinary matters is restricted; courts shall not act as appellate bodies to re-evaluate evidence of unauthorized absence or substitute the penalty imposed by a competent author....
The importance of following prescribed procedures and principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.