Vikram S/o Radheyshyam vs State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 543

KULDEEP MATHUR
Vikram S/o Radheyshyam – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Kuldeep Sharma, D.S. Gharsana.
For the Respondent: Anda Ram Choudhary.
For the Complainant : Om Singh Chouhan.

JUDGMENT :

KULDEEP MATHUR, J.

1. The instant application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. and appeal under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act have been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 727/2022 registered at Police Station Hanumangarh Junction, District Hanumangarh, for offences under Sections 306 and 34 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

2. As per prosecution story, on 20.10.2022 the deceased committed suicide by jumping into a canal. As per prosecution, the deceased was being harassed and humiliated by the present petitioner/appellant owing to the fact that high interest was being charged by them against the money lent by them to the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioner/appellant submitted that the petitioner and appellant have been implicated in a false case. Learned counsel submitted that a suicide note has also been recovered and from perusal of the same, it would be evident that the petitioner and appellant are not guilty of the act of abetment of suicide. Learned counsel submitted that the essential ingredients

Click Here to Read the rest of this document