SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 952

KULDEEP MATHUR
Mangal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Rajesh Panwar, Advocate, Ayush Gehlot, Advocate, Laxman Solanki, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Kuldeep Mathur, J. - The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.121/2022 registered at Police Station Mt. Abu, District Sirohi, for the offences under Sections 306 of IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that there is no prima facie evidence available on record to prove the involvement of the appellant in the abetment of suicide of the deceased. Challan has already been filed. The appellant is in judicial custody since long and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time to conclude. Thus, learned counsel submits that benefit of bail may be extended to the appellant.

4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel appearing for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail application.

5. Having regard to the totality of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon consideration of the arguments advanced without commenting on the merits of the case, this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top