PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Dilip Buildcon Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI, J.
1. These writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been preferred claiming the following reliefs:
“It is, therefore, prayed that present writ petition may kindly be allowed:
(a) By an appropriate writ order or direction the impugned decision dated 31.5.2023 (An-12) along with all subsequent/consequential orders/ decisions may kindly be quashed.
(b) By an appropriate writ order or direction, the original decision dated 19.5.2023 (An-5) may kindly be restored in its original and the financial bid of the petitioner be considered and evaluated.
(c) In the alternative, by an appropriate writ order or direction, the procurement proceedings in tender no. CE/WRD/JDPR/05/2022-2023/Item No. 02, being in violation of RTPP rules 2013, may kindly be quashed.
(d) Any other appropriate order or direction which may be deemed just and proper in the circumstances of the case may be passed in favour of the petitioner.”
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8307/2023:
“It is, therefore, prayed that present writ petition may kindly be allowed:
(a) By an appropriate writ order or direction the impugned decision dated 31.5
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.