Sita Ram S/o Bhuana vs State of Rajasthan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 701

FARJAND ALI
Sita Ram S/o Bhuana – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Vineet Jain, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Praveen Vyas
For the Respondent: Mr. Abhishek Purohit,

JUDGMENT :

1. The appellants have preferred the instant appeal under Section 374(1) of the CrPC being aggrieved of the judgment dated 11.12.1993 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhilwara, Camp Shahpura in Sessions Case No.25/1990, whereby all the appellants have been convicted for the offences under Section 325 read with Section 149 of the IPC and 323 read with Section 149 of the IPC. Further the appellants Gheesa, Jagdish, Jamna Lal, Sita Ram and Ram Kuaar have been convicted for the offence under Section 148 of the IPC and appellants Bhoora Lal, Mst. Omkari and Mst. Mangi have been convicted for the offence under Section 147 of the IPC. The appellants Nos.4 to 8, namely, Mst. Mani, Mst. Omkari, Bhoora Lal, Jagdish and Ram Kuaar, have been ordered to be released on probation, whereas sentences have been awarded to the remaining appellants for their

Offence for which convicted Sentence, Fine and Default Sentence

Section 148 IPC 6 months' rigorous imprisonment alongwith a fine of Rs.500/- and in default of payment of fine, 1 month's simple imprisonment

Section 325 IPC read with Section 149 IPC 3 years' rigorous imprisonment alongwith a fine of Rs.1000/- and in default of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document