IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Vijay Bishnoi, Praveer Bhatnagar, JJ.
Soni Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors. – Respondent
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 355 of 2022
Decided On : 15-02-2023
Habeas Corpus - Custody Dispute - The court issued directions for the admission of the minor corpus in a girls hostel to continue her studies, ensuring her safety and well-being.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner alleged that her grand-daughter was missing and apprehended that respondent No.4 might have kidnapped her. The corpus had previously eloped with respondent No.4, leading to police intervention and her subsequent custody being handed over to the petitioner.
Finding of the Court:
The court interacted with the corpus, who expressed her desire to go with the petitioner or her parents. However, the father refused to take her custody, leading to the court ordering her lodging in Balika Grah, Jodhpur. Subsequently, the corpus expressed readiness to go with her father and grandmother, but had apprehensions about potential harassment and disruption of her studies.
Issues: Custody dispute, safety and well-being of the minor corpus, continuation of studies.
Ratio Decidendi: The court prioritized the safety and well-being of the minor corpus, issuing directions for her admission in a girls hostel to continue her studies.
Final Decision: The habeas corpus petition was disposed of, with instructions for the Child Welfare Committee to monitor the corpus's stay in the girls hostel.
JUDGMENT
1. This habeas corpus petition is filed by the petitioner alleging therein that her grand-daughter is missing since 19.07.2022 and she has apprehension that respondent No.4 might have kidnapped her. It is also averred in the petition that earlier also, the corpus eloped with the respondent No.4 and in relation to that, the petitioner lodged a report with the Police, wherein her grand-daughter was traced out and produced before the Child Welfare Committee and, thereafter, she was sent to the Juvenile Home (Female), Jodhpur and after two months, on the request of the corpus, her custody was handed over to the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on 06.09.2022, again the respondent No.4 had kidnapped petitioner’s grand-daughter and she was in his illegal confinement. It is further submitted that in relation to that, an FIR No.240/2022 was lodged at Police Station Sadar Pali, District Pali on 10.10.2022, however, the police is not making sincere efforts to trace out the corpus. It is specifically averred in the petition that the petitioner’s grand-daughter is minor and there is apprehension that she may be trafficked somewhere and may be forced to enter into illegal activities.
3. Pursuant to the directions given by this Court, the corpus was produced before us on 02.01.2023. On that day, we have interacted with the corpus and she has stated that she eloped with the respondent No.4 as per her own free will, however, now she wants to go with the petitioner or her parents. On that day, the father of the corpus was present in person before this Court, however, he refused to take her custody and this Court ordered to lodge the corpus in Balika Grah, Jodhpur.
4. On 06.02.2023, the corpus was produced before this Court and on that day, she has stated that she is ready to go with her father and her grand-mother, but she has apprehension that they may harass her and will not allow to continue her studies.
5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court issued directions to the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Jodhpur to do the needful in the matter so that the corpus may be admitted in the girls hostel to continue her studies.
6. Today, report of the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Jodhpur is placed on record, wherein it is mentioned that the corpus already admitted in Kasturba Gandhi Awasiya Vidhalaya, Type III, Pali City on 08.02.2023 in seventh standard and her studies are going on.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is satisfied and feeling safe that her grand-daughter is admitted in Kasturba Gandhi Awasiya Vidhalaya, Type III, Pali City.
8. In view of the above facts and circumstances, this habeas corpus petition is disposed of, however, we instruct the Child Welfare Committee, Pali to monitor the stay of the corpus in Kasturba Gandhi Awasiya Vidhalaya, Type III, Pali City from time to time.
9. The report produced by the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Jodhpur is taken on record.
The court prioritized the best interests of the minor corpus, ensuring her safety and well-being in a custody dispute.
The wishes of an individual who has reached the age of majority are paramount in determining the legality of their detention and residence.
The court prioritized the best interests of the minor sister and granted custody to the petitioner based on her expressed desire and the absence of her parents.
The validity of an order passed by the Child Welfare Committee under the Juvenile Justice Act cannot be examined in a writ of habeas corpus, and only parents can claim custody of a minor.
The court reinforced that habeas corpus relief is unwarranted when the individuals are found safe and not detained illegally.
The natural guardian's entitlement to custody and the limited scope of a habeas corpus petition.
The paramount consideration for the court in cases involving minors is the welfare of the minor, and the court may invoke its extraordinary jurisdiction to determine custody based on the welfare of t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.