SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 959

KULDEEP MATHUR
Sabir Khan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kailash Khilery, Advocate, Arun Kumar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Kuldeep Mathur, J. - This application for bail has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.208/2019, Police Station Mandalgarh, Bhilwara for the offence under Section 8/15 of the NDPS Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record.

3. It is argued by learned counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the matter. Learned counsel has further submitted that the contraband poppy-straw, weighing 201 kg., was seized from pick-up having no. RJ-21-G1-6249. The driver of the vehicle, during interrogation, disclosed the name of Babu @ Yakub Khan to whom contraband (poppy-straw) was to be delivered. Further, Babu @ Yakub Khan disclosed the name of petitioner stating that he is the owner of pick-up No.RJ-21-G1-6249. It is in this back-ground, learned counsel submitted that there is no direct involvement of the petitioner in the present case and he had no knowledge of contraband being transported in the Vehicle No.RJ-21-G1-6249. Learned counsel also submitted that there is no evidence showing involvement of the petitioner in the present case except

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top