ARUN BHANSALI
Mukesh Rani – Appellant
Versus
Tara Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the orders dated 25.4.2022 (Annex.12) passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat, whereby, the application filed by the petitioner under Order I Rule 10 CPC has been rejected and order dated 2.5.2022 (Annex.13), whereby, the petition filed by respondent no.1 has been accepted.
2. It is inter alia indicated in the petition that property owned by petitioner was let out inter alia to respondent no.1. On account of certain vigilance inquiry, the bill amounting to Rs.12 lakh & odd was issued qua the premises, wherein it was specifically indicated that the property was in possession of respondent no.1, the respondent no.1 vacated the premises and shifted his factory at some other place and applied for grant of electricity connection, which was denied by the respondent - JVVNL on account of the fact that amount pursuant to the vigilance inquiry was due with respondent no.1.
3. Feeling aggrieved, the respondent no.1 approached the Permanent Lok Adalat.
4. During pendency of the said proceedings, the petitioner made an application before the Permanent Lok Adalat seeking impleadment, inasmuch as, in case, the application f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.