SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1047

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Lal Shankar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jai Naveen, Advocate, Vikas Bijarnia, Advocate, S.K. Mehar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in connection with the FIR No. 36/2022 registered at Police Station Patiya, District Udaipur for the offences punishable under Sections 366 and 376 of IPC.

2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prosecutrix was major and she resided with the petitioner for about three days and during this period, she did not raise any hue and cry. Challan of the case has already been presented and no investigation is pending against the petitioner. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

3. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Lal Shankar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top