SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1049

MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Sunil – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Suresh Nehra, Advocate, S.K. Mehar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Garg, J. - The instant bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in connection with the FIR No. 662/2022 registered at Police Station Rawatsar, District Hanumangarh for the offences punishable under Sections 457, 380 and 427 of IPC.

2. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioners are behind the bars and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioners.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

3. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

4. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Sunil S/o Sh. Rajkumar; and (2) Vicky S/o Sh. Khetaram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 662/2022 registered at Police Station Rawatsar, District H

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top