SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2661

PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Rakesh Gehlot – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Nishant Bora, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP, Mr. Shravan Kumar Sainee, Advocate and Mr. C.P. Soni, Advocate, for the Respondent.

Judgement Key Points

What is the effect of the rejection of a Section 91 Cr.P.C. application on subsequent applications on the same facts and grounds between the same parties?

What is the court’s stance on considering a wife’s income and compliance with Rajnesh Vs. Neha (2021) 2 SCC 324 in Section 91 Cr.P.C. applications for interim maintenance?

What is the court’s direction regarding interim maintenance and the trial Court’s handling of observations in prior orders?


ORDER

1. This criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred assailing the order dated 08.04.2022 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate No.5, Jodhpur Metropolitan in Case No.1666/2018 whereby the learned trial court has dismissed the application filed under Section 91 Cr.P.C.

2. Learned counsel for the parties have fairly shown the judgment pertaining to Section 91 Cr.P.C., passed by this Court in Rakesh Gehlot Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. (S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.6048/2021) on 09.09.2022, which reads as follows:

    "1. This Criminal Misc. Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred claiming the following reliefs:

    ’It is, therefore most respectfully prayed that the application filed by the petitioner u/s.482 Cr.P.C. may be allowed and:

    The order dated 22.10.2021 passed by the learned Family Court No.2, Jodhpur Metropolitan, Jodhpur in Criminal Case No.69/2019 may kindly be quashed and set aside and the application filed by the petitioner under Section 91 Cr.P.C. may kindly be allowed as prayed for.’

    2. Brief facts of this case, as placed before this Court by learned counsel for the petitioner, are that a complaint was filed by the complainant/res

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top