DINESH MEHTA
Sukhlal – Appellant
Versus
Parvati – Respondent
ORDER
1. By way of the present appeal, the appellants have challenged the order dated 19.11.2019, passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dungarpur (hereinafter after referred to as "the Tribunal"), whereby a claim petition filed by the respondentclaimants No.1 to 6 was allowed while holding the appellant -owner of the vehicle liable for the claim. The insurance company -respondent No.7 was though held not liable but has been asked to pay the amount of claim, with a stipulation that the insurance company would be entitled to recover the amount from the present appellant-owner of the vehicle.
2. The present appellant was held liable for the claim amount, as the learned Tribunal found that the appellant-owner of the vehicle - Tempo bearing registration No.RJ-12-TA-1420 was not having a fitness certificate, which amounted to violation of policy conditions.
3. Mr. Jain, learned counsel for the appellant argued that if the Transport authority wanted to cancel petitioner’s fitness certificate it was required to pass a speaking order after providing an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Since, neither any proceedings were initiated nor the permit issued qua the Tempo in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.