SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 2797

VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Choturam – Appellant
Versus
Baburam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Paramveer Singh, for the Appellant; Mr. HS Balot, for the Respondent

ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present writ petition has been filed against the order dated 15.10.2014 passed by Additional District Judge No. 2, Jodhpur Metropolitan, whereby the application preferred by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC was rejected and filing of the written statement by the petitioner was closed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent preferred a suit before the trial court for recovery of the money due from the petitioner and the learned trial court vide order dated 12.09.2012, rejected the application preferred by the petitioner under Order 9 Rule 11 CPC for setting aside the ex parte judgment and decree dated 25.11.2005. Against the rejection of the application under Order 9 Rule 11 CPC, the petitioner preferred S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 2218/2012 before this Court and the same was allowed vide order dated 09.05.2014. The parties were directed to appear before learned trial court and the learned trial court was directed to proceed with the suit from the stage of service of summons and was also directed to decide the same within a period of one year. In these circumstances, the parties

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top