SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Raj) 804

MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Rekha D/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Balmukund S/o Shri Roop Lal Menariya – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. SL Jain
For the Respondent: Mr. NK Rastogi

JUDGMENT :

The appeal under Order 43, Rule 1(r), CPC is directed against the order dated 27.11.2020 passed by the learned Additional District Judge No. 1, Chittorgarh (hereinafter referred to as the learned Trial Court) whereby the learned Trial Court dismissed the application of the appellant-plaintiff under Order 39, Rule 1 & 2, CPC.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits hat the order passed by the learned Trial Court is arbitrary and perverse and deserves to be quashed and set aside. It is submitted that the balance of convenience, irreparable loss and prima facie case lies in favor of appellant. Thus, it is prayed that the impugned order may be quashed and set aside and the application under Order 39, Rule 1 & 2 may be allowed.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent objects to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the appellant and submits that the impugned order is well reasoned and calls for no interference.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

5. A perusal of the material available on record makes it clear that the original suit itself is pending consideration before the learned Trial court since the year 2012.

6. Theref

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top